首页> 外文OA文献 >Combined intravitreal ranibizumab and verteporfin photodynamic therapy versus ranibizumab alone for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration
【2h】

Combined intravitreal ranibizumab and verteporfin photodynamic therapy versus ranibizumab alone for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration

机译:玻璃体腔内兰尼珠单抗联合维替泊芬光动力疗法与单独兰尼单抗联合治疗老年性黄斑变性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: To compare same-day combined therapy of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (PDT-V)\udand intravitreal ranibizumab versus monotherapy with ranibizumab for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization.\udMethods: In this prospective study, the total number of eyes was randomized into two groups: in the first,\udtreatment consisted of a combined therapy of PDT-V and ranibizumab 0.5 mg on the same day; in the second,\udranibizumab 0.5 mg in 3 monthly injections. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular\udthickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) were recorded before and 6 months after treatment.\udResults: A total of 47 eyes of 47 subjects were enrolled in the study. In the combined-therapy group\ud(group 1), the mean baseline BCVA ± standard deviation (SD) was 32.65 ± 11.09 letters (Snellen equivalent,\ud20/59); in the ranibizumab-alone group (group 2), 29.13 ± 9.03 letters (20/70). At 6 months’ followup,\udin group 1 the mean baseline BCVA was 39.06 ± 10.12 letters (20/42); in group 2, 33.87 ± 12.06 letters\ud(20/57). Improvement was significant in both group 1 (P = 0.03) and group 2 (P = 0.002). In group 1, the\udmean CMT at baseline ± SD was 315 ± 95.49 μm; in group 2, 306.33 ± 71.61 μm. At 6 months’ follow-up,\udin group 1 it was 202 ± 52.02 μm; in group 2, 226 ± 65.58 μm. Reduction was significant in both group 1\ud(P = 0.0007) and group 2 (P = 0.00001). After 6-months, the rate of retreated eyes was 29.4% in group 1\udand 43.3% in group 2. The need for retreatment did not depend on the treatment protocol (P = 0.34).\udConclusions: From a functional and anatomic point of view, the two treatments showed equivalent efficacy,\udwith fewer retreatments in group 1. No serious adverse events, such as retinal detachment, endophthalmitis,\udor ocular hypertension occurred in either group.
机译:目的:比较当日联合Verteporfin(PDT-V)\ ud和玻璃体内雷珠单抗联合光疗疗法与雷珠单抗单一疗法联合治疗脉络膜新生血管的联合疗法。\ ud方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,将眼睛总数随机分为分为两组:第一,联合治疗由同一天的PDT-V和兰尼单抗0.5 mg联合治疗组成;在第二次,\ udranibizumab 0.5毫克,每月3次注射。在治疗前和治疗后6个月记录光学相干断层扫描(OCT)的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中央黄斑\厚度(CMT)。\ ud结果:该研究共纳入47名受试者的47只眼。在联合治疗组\ ud(第1组)中,平均基线BCVA±标准差(SD)为32.65±11.09个字母(相当于Snellen,\ ud20 / 59);单独使用兰尼单抗的患者(第2组)为29.13±9.03个字母(20/70)。随访6个月,\ udin组1的平均基线BCVA为39.06±10.12个字母(20/42);在第2组中,33.87±12.06个字母\ ud(20/57)。第1组(P = 0.03)和第2组(P = 0.002)均有显着改善。在第1组中,基线±SD的平均CMT为315±95.49μm。在第2组中,306.33±71.61μm。随访6个月,\ udin组1为202±52.02μm;在第2组中,226±65.58μm。在第1 \ ud(P = 0.0007)组和第2组(P = 0.00001)中,减少均显着。 6个月后,第1组的复眼率为29.4%\第2组的复眼为43.3%。重新治疗的需要并不取决于治疗方案(P = 0.34)。\ ud结论:从功能和解剖学角度鉴于,这两种治疗方法均显示出相同的疗效,而在第1组中仅需较少的再治疗。两组均未发生严重的不良事件,例如视网膜脱离,眼内炎,眼压升高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号